We begin our project with one question: how we could help our audiences to understand the constitutional process and get to know the candidates that aspired to be part of the organ that would write the new Chilean constitution (and their positions on key topics).
After a year, several iterations and products, we created an interactive, intuitive, easy, and entertaining tool to help people to be involved and participate in such an important election process we had during 2021. At the same time, we built datasets with information that no other media had and that let us publish relevant and interesting analyses about the elected bodies and the possible political outcomes of these elections in the future of our country.

A special edition of our Constituent Match focusing on the exit plebiscite of 2023, allowing users to find out which side of the plebiscite's outcome they align with based on their responses.
view
The latest installment of our Constituent Match series for the year 2023, offering users a way to discover which candidates align with their views for the upcoming elections.
view
A new feature of our Constituent Match series, focusing on gauging public sentiment about the plebiscite through a series of questions to match users with similar viewpoints.
view
We improved the work of visualization we did in The Chosen Ones with the data of the elected Congress.
view
The day after the election we published a simple and clean page to show all the results of the winning deputies and senators.
view
For the presidential, senatoria and deputies election we upgrade our game. We had our traditional match running, but also, with the help of the data scientist Jorge Fábrega, developed an “ideológical map”, using the scaling method NOMINATE, visualizing one ax graphic for the Congress, and two axes -like the classic Political Compass- for president.
view
Taking the experience of our Constituent Match, we offered a version with the same interface for the presidential primaries.
view
Using D3 we launched a data visualization where we showed all our data and made a crossing between the answers of the conventionals and different characteristics in detail.
view
To help our audiences to get to know the conventional constituents, the day the constitutional convention started we launched this landing with the full list, linked to the profiles we had built previously.
view
We made a zoom to the analysis taking as reference the electoral lists and parties of the conventional constituents.
view
This was the first presentation of the analysis we made with the answers to our survey. We were able to profile the positions of the constitutional convention on key topics.
view
We chose to play with the concept of 'make a Match' -from dating apps like Tinder- with the candidate which had more in common with every person, crossing the answers that every candidate responded in our survey with the answers from the users.
view
We built a dataset with detailed information of all the 1400 candidates to the Constitutional Convention, even before the Electoral Service published the official list. It has become an “alternative Wikipedia” for the constitutional conventionals.
view
Our first match, our beta version. We started to iterate this project asking public figures about key issues of the constitution so people could discover with whom they have more affinity.
view